🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.